CHANGE THE PROCESS

I am a retired USAF pilot who attained the rank of Lieutenant Colonel. I understand mishap investigations, professional cultural issues, and the training and discipline of a profession that uses deadly force. Most importantly, I am a father who lost a son due to problems associated with the current law enforcement culture and training.

The Problem

• Wisconsin Statutes regarding law enforcement are the oldest in the nation (125 years) and do not provide for a centralized professional review, called an External Professional Review.
• Currently, these statutes give each community “Home Rule.” This means that local police review themselves with bias at the departmental level, called an Internal Organizational Review. The local chief then passes judgment on the performance of his organization, his own policies, and his own abilities.
• There are no external checks and balances to maintain objectivity in the current investigative process. This procedure negatively affects training and culture in a multitude of ways.
• There are no elected officials who are held directly accountable for law enforcement culture.
• District attorneys, overworked and understaffed, work daily with officers on investigations and are reluctant to upset the close relationship established among them. Additionally, they do not want to put voter or police union support at risk with a coroner’s inquest or charges against officers.
• Local police and fire commissioners are appointed by a community leader and are reluctant to speak against the city or the authority of the District Attorney or police chief. These individuals do not have the skills or training to review police shooting investigations.

The following solution addresses each problem stated above. This solution, as presented below, is currently believed to be the only existing Review Board Guidelines of its kind in the country.

Chief Shield Firearms Discharge Review Board

The Chief Shield Review Board consists of three to five police chiefs or assistant police chiefs, either active or retired, who are appointed by the Wisconsin Attorney General to review a firearms discharge that has resulted in a serious injury or fatality. The police chief of the municipality in which a firearms discharge has occurred would not be allowed to serve on the panel to review his/her own organization.

Law enforcement must review law enforcement. In order to maintain objectivity, local law enforcement, with the assistance of outside law enforcement, would conduct the investigation and pass the detailed investigative findings to the Chief Shield Review Board for analysis and recommendations. After the CSRB review is complete, the Board passes its findings to the local chief and District Attorney for accolades or, if necessary, disciplinary or criminal charges. The benefits include the following:

• A senior elected official is directly held accountable for state law enforcement culture
• Law Enforcement reviews itself (professional external review)
• The District Attorney and the local police chief are removed from the pressures of making objective decisions affecting current organizational and voter/union relationships
• The review process involves many external and internal personnel to ensure the integrity, objectivity, and fairness of the process
• This process establishes checks and balances assuring the highest standards in training/culture

Please contact your state representatives to advise them that, as a voter, you support the Chief Shield Firearms Discharge Review Board.

Should a Police Department Be Left
to Judge Itself? Voice Your Opinion:

Mayor Keith Bosman
625 52nd Street, Room 300
Kenosha, WI 53140
(262)653-4000
mayor@kenosha.org

Police Chief John Morrissey
1000 55th Street
Kenosha, WI 53141
(262)605-5200/5202
JWM309@kenoshapolice.com
http://kenoshapolice.com/tip.aspx

www.conflictinginterest.com